Subaru Forester Owners Forum banner
  • The "Garage" feature is for images of YOUR VEHICLE/S only - no blanks or other unrelated images please, thanks
41 - 60 of 71 Posts
Everyone still happy with these? I'm looking to replace the stock Yokohama's on my '16 Forester with these. We get a lot of rain and snow here and those stock are awful. I'm mostly a road city/highway driver with occasional light off road
 
Everyone still happy with these?...I'm mostly a road city/highway driver with occasional light off road
This the exact scenario that the TerrainContacts were designed for. I put these immediately on my new 2018 Forester; that was 4000 miles ago.
I like them so much I just put a set on my Grand Cherokee.
 
Any one run these on anything wider than the stock 7in wide rim, like an 8in, and have pictures?
 
Just had the Terrain Contact A/T's installed this morning on my '16 Forester - so far so good! I will post some pics later :)
 
The Terrain Contact also comes in 245-65-17. Anyone know if that will work on stock wheels without a lift on a 2017 foz? I'm guessing the diameter is probably OK, but the extra width will result in rubbing, and either lift or wheel with different offset would be required to avoid rubbing.
 
Why not keep the stock size? You are going wider AND taller. While you're inside diameter is remaining the same at 17 - the size of the wheel - your outside diameter is growing.

Remember that the aspect ratio - 65 - is a percentage of your tread width. This means that the sidewall of the tire is 65% of 245 mm. The stock tire is a 225 mm tread width with a 60% aspect ratio. So this means that where the rubber meets the road - the outside diameter - you are growing in size and in the number of times the tire will turn within a mile is changing. This means your speedometer will be off and your odometer will be off by a percentage.

Do a Google search for one of the tire size calculators - there are lots - online and it will show you the percentage of change that you will be experiencing.

I am also looking at the terrain contact, but we'll be keeping the stock size as it is available. There is the geolandar go15 [or something like that] also available in stock size. And then Cooper has their all-terrain tire in a slightly taller aspect ratio of 65 percent but still the same stock 225 with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Natedog
Save
I have 1,000 miles on my TerrainContacts and have no regrets. I see no down sides versus the crappy stock Bridgestones. I switched to Crosstrek 17" wheels and went with 225/60-17's. I saw after I bought them that they tied for Consumer Reports highest A/T tire rating.
 

Attachments

Why not keep the stock size? You are going wider AND taller. While you're inside diameter is remaining the same at 17 - the size of the wheel - your outside diameter is growing.

Taller tire is an easy way to get a little more ground clearance for a lot less money than a lift. Plus the taller tire provides more ground clearance for the drive train/subframe components as well as the unibody, which a lift doesn't do. I do just enough off-roading that I was inclined to do a 2" lift and go with the BFG KO2s, which I liked on my 4X4 Ford Ranger. But i don't want to give up too much highway performance on pavement or MPG, and I saw that the TerrainContact was top rated by both Consumer Reports and Tire Rack, so I thought the Terrain Contact in the bigger size might be a good way to get a little lift and better offroad capabilty than the stock Geolander G91s. If the Terrain Contact 245-65-17s on the stock wheels fit in the wheel well and clear the calipers and spring perches on the strut, I think I'd get the offroad performance improvements and little bit of extra ground clearance I'm looking for, maintain reasonably good highway performance, and save the costs of the lift and new wheels. That all seems too good to be true, so I suspect there's a problem with the fit or I'd be hearing from others who've done it.
 
The Terrain Contact also comes in 245-65-17. Anyone know if that will work on stock wheels without a lift on a 2017 foz? I'm guessing the diameter is probably OK, but the extra width will result in rubbing, and either lift or wheel with different offset would be required to avoid rubbing.
IMO that tire is too wide for stock rims and will tend to crown the tire, resulting in poor handling and less than ideal tread wear patterns. If it does not rub the strut at base of spring seat, it will be very close. 225/65R17 is what my buddy runs on his Forester and Outback, he loves it and no rubbing, about 1/2" more ground clearance and smooths out the bumps nicely.
 
Just normal 2 ply, but a 4 ply rating I think? "...two high-tensile steel belts with a spirally-wound polyamide reinforcement supported by a two-ply casing."

The protection I was referring to are the rubber blocks built into the first inch or so of the sidewall, along with the rim protector edge.
I don't do anything rock-crawly enough or often enough to warrant true all terrains with heavy duty sidewalls.
 
I got a set in UK, it is branded here as Cross Contacts. Very pleased so far, looks great as well on the standard 17” wheels in 225/60/17 size. What PSI are people using on these?
 

Attachments

Forester XT with TerrainContact

After much research, including this and other threads, I also just picked up a set of 225-60-17 Continental TerrainContact's for my 2017 Forester XT. I picked up a set of BRZ wheels on OfferUp for a great deal ($50 per wheel). So far the tires are great, no louder then stock (other then the first 20 miles as they break in), and ride well. I also got a 225-60-17 Arizonian Silver Edition as a full size spare, got that to stuff in the spare tire well by taking out all styrofoam (but left the jack caddy).
 

Attachments

After a month of driving on the TerrainContacts, liking these tires. Yet to take them off road, but as an on road tire (city and freeway) they definitely exceed the OEM Duelers.
 
Have you driven in the ice and snow with these tires?
Would also love a report on snow / ice handling once someone has had a chance to put these through their paces. Does the slightly wider contact patch lead to extra float in deeper snow or do the tires still sink down and make good base contact?

Also, does anyone know if the wider width over OEM will create issues with snow chains (cables)? As it is, only very low profile cables work without rubbing. It is very rare that I’ve had to use them, but I’d still like to know for sure.
Thanks in advance!!
 
41 - 60 of 71 Posts
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.