this is a genuine question I have, not a troll, not an insult not an attack or whatever else you might be thinking.
I started looking into buying a new SUV at the beginning of the year and eventually settled on the 2014 forester. I am very happy with it.
I selected it and then confirmed my selection when consumer reports gave it a great review.
eventually I bought one in June when I couldn't wait any longer for the configuration I really wanted and didn't want to wait up to 4 months for a touring with eyesight in Red (HAD TO BE RED).
here is my question.
I considered the outback, test drove it etc.
I didn't see any advantage of the outback over the forester. I thought the forester was far superior. Consumer reports agreed also.
however around the San Francisco bay area I probably see 80% outbacks versus 20% foresters of the new unplated Subaru's I see as I drive around.
why is that ? what do people see in the outback that I didn't see ?
I honestly couldn't see any advantage for me.
I started looking into buying a new SUV at the beginning of the year and eventually settled on the 2014 forester. I am very happy with it.
I selected it and then confirmed my selection when consumer reports gave it a great review.
eventually I bought one in June when I couldn't wait any longer for the configuration I really wanted and didn't want to wait up to 4 months for a touring with eyesight in Red (HAD TO BE RED).
here is my question.
I considered the outback, test drove it etc.
I didn't see any advantage of the outback over the forester. I thought the forester was far superior. Consumer reports agreed also.
however around the San Francisco bay area I probably see 80% outbacks versus 20% foresters of the new unplated Subaru's I see as I drive around.
why is that ? what do people see in the outback that I didn't see ?
I honestly couldn't see any advantage for me.