Re: Forester "off-road"
The only advantage the Matrix and Mazda3 has is price. Both are more affordable than the XT. No surprise there.
If you've meant getting from point A to point B, then yeah, all three can perform that task. Other than that, I wouldn't even consider them as being the same. Not even close.
AWD + Turbo = WINS
We have considered Mazda3, along with the Matrix XR when shopping for new vehicle. After test driving all three, I can honestly say there is absolutely no contest - XT win hands down. My wife, who's 5 ft even, complaint the 3 felt claustophobic. Also, the rear seating is smaller than expected. Too bad, because I like the handling and styling. The Matrix seemed purposeful, but the lack of power is a big turn off, plus visual around the vehicle is not so good. The XT is like a green house - glass everywhere, no major concern for blindspots.procabbie said:My final choice in a new car was between the Mazda 3 hatchback, or the Forester. For all intents and purposes, they are the same car, until you leave the pavement, or encounter snow.
The only advantage the Matrix and Mazda3 has is price. Both are more affordable than the XT. No surprise there.
If you've meant getting from point A to point B, then yeah, all three can perform that task. Other than that, I wouldn't even consider them as being the same. Not even close.
AWD + Turbo = WINS