1)The CVT is just not something to be messed with - agreed
1. What is your definition of “messing with” ? crack open? DefinitelyChange CVTF? Extreme use or normal driving? Not following the service instructions. Changing the oil for no reason - even if you get the oil changed at a dealer, they will likely analyze it first and tell you yes or no.
2. Did you even read 2014/5 Forester official maintenance manual about CVTF change process? Just the bulletin quickly. I don't have a manual, yet. I seem to remember there was more to it, like monitoring parameters with their dealer tool while filling with the car on and changing gears at specific temperatures, and a procedure on flushing using a special pump? Sorry, don't have access anymore. One thing that is good to do, is they update the software for the CVT regularly, so if you don't service at the dealer, you don't get the updated firmware
2) It is different - agreed
1. how different? sorry, in your words. The layout of the Lineartronic is different compared to the original Jatco ones because of the flat-4 layout. Everything is arranged differently compared to all others on the market I would guess. The torque converter is different and has a different locking mechanism and control system to lock much earlier and let the CVT do the work instead of the TC. The chain allows a much tighter radius for a wider gearing and better direct starting torque compared to belt types. There's a bunch of pictures around
Lineartronic® CVT???? and some subaru vids:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ2kp5YOXHA
The chain type on Subaru's ride on the metal pins on the sides that hold the links together and use friction to transfer the torque and is a pull type CVT.
3)The oil is ~50% of why the CVT works so well - ?
1: Do you have any backup literature which supports your statement? Sure, read up:
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=micro+slip+in+chain+cvt https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...qWTCikjNcTgQ2OBfg&sig2=SpgXEwyJZZTrEao_ASicaQ
2: Where does that ~50% come from? SWAG. The chain/oil combo is what distinguishes itself above others. The oil has 2 part duty: to ensure friction between the belt and sheaves without macroslipping, and to lubricate the seals, gear and other components inside. So, lubricate and enhance friction, got it? This is the battle. The fluid is engineered to provide lubrication without slipping. If it slips, it wears, if it doesn't, it'll last "forever." Since Subaru's Lineartronic was developed in house, made in house, and their juice was too AFAIK, I am not confident that any other oil would be ideal, or they would have used it. The general design and materials, along with their unique TC and hydraulic pump design are the rest.
4)Even though the other CVT oil brands say they are developed for that type of CVT, they are simply not approved
Ok.. Educate me by answering below questions.
1: What CVT oil brands you are talking about? ALL of them. Most fluid makers have their flavor designed for metal belts. But, the conditions in Subaru's CVT are different than everyone else, including their previous gen. So, why would it work for all of them
ideally?
2: Who is approving authority? Subaru? Idemitsu? Subaru. Idemitsu doesn't appear to make the CVT oil, just engine and some gear oils. All I could find is that it's Subaru. I'd be curious to know for sure.
3: Does Subaru make Subaru CVT oil or from supplier? ^^
4: Do you have MSDS & Additive packaging for Subaru CVT oil? Nope. There's a website that has it, but requires a login. That only tells what's in it anyway, not how they make it. It's like baking a cake by giving only the ingredients, not the recipe.
5: Is Subaru CVT oil Full Synthetic or Dino oil? Given lifetime status, it must be synthetic. Dino oil isn't stable enough and would oxidize and break down over time
6: Is Subaru CVT oil classified as Group 3 or Group 4? Don't know
7: what is the difference between approve and certify? Not much. Who is giving the OK is what's important. All the CVT oil MFGs say designed for, and use on Subaru chain type, etc., but Subaru hasn't said it's ok, so even though it may work, hasn't gotten the ok. Unless Subaru says it's ok, then you probably will get denied warranty coverage if needed.
5)Half of the examples I did find were due to wrong oil used, 2 seal failures and one chain failure - interesting. do you have resources/link that we can look at? want to learn from you. The wrong oil is on the typical Subie forums, including this one, the seal failures were from my dealer, and the chain failure was a german dude that got reposted on a forum but couldn't find it quickly. There are a few others, but you never hear about what actually failed since they are sent to Japan.
6)Unless you work from their specific tech bulletin, I would discourage encouraging others.
1: Which paragraph did I encourage others to do what? By simply posting the DIY without any disclaimers and implying that x-interval is ok/better than listening to Subaru. Your post may be used by thousands of people in the near future, for better or worse
2: Isn’t this forum that we can post DIY work? Is that bad? Generally, no. In this case, the risk is higher than normal, which is what I was highlighting
3: Why don’t you post your DIY work next time and helping others as a contribution? Definitely, but I don't have my forester yet. Waiting for the '16. But head over to NASIOC. I've been doing that for years.
7)But, by all means, mess with the rest! - really?
-- Is this from Subaru or you, engineer’s opinion that it is ok to mess with the rest except CVT?
So, except CVT, if DIYer mess with all the rest parts such as Differential, Engine,…etc Subaru will cover them?
No, but if you break something, or can't figure out how to fix it, there's a lot of places to go to to fix it for you, or find the information you need. Thant's not the case with the CVT. I love to work on cars, and enhance their performance. I have a 400whp '11 STi in the driveway. The risks inherent with that are manageable/known.
Again, thank you for your concern.