![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance | Advertise |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 99
Location: Portland, Oregon
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester XT
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
My car is an 05 Forester XT, with 140,000 miles. My mechanic did a compression & leak-down test while he was changing out spark plugs. My problem is that I have no idea what to make of the results. He says the compression, by cylinder, was 132,132, 135,139. Does this sound low? The spread between high and low is right at 5%. The car seems to run ok... should I be concerned?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 409
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester XT
Transmission: AT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
Those look pretty good for 140,000 mes. They are pretty consistent across all 4 . What should they be? 140+
__________________
2005 FXT 2010 Sti |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 796
Location: New Jersey
Car Year: 04
Car Model: XT 68HTA
Transmission: 12.20@113
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
You should be good there...the difference between the cylinders is more important than the compression numbers themselves in my opinion...different equipment might read different, also how quick you do the test after the car has been shut off changes the readings too..
What were the leakdown results? They are just as important or even more important than the compression test imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 99
Location: Portland, Oregon
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester XT
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Full Results:
Cylinder 1 - 139# & 4% LD Cylinder 2- 132# & 5% LD Cylinder 3- 135# & 4% LD Cylinder 4- 132# & 5% LD So, what do you think? Any cause for alarm? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Smooshed FOTY 2011
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,273
Location: Durango, Colorado
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester 2.5 XT
Transmission: 5-Speed MT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
You aren't looking for PSI as much as you are looking for consistency. I believe the "actual" PSI is somewhere up in the 170s, but depending on the gauge, they usually read low. My compression gauge (even on m newly rebuilt engine) only read around 140/cylinder.
I believe the alarm would raise if a single piston was off by around 7-10% more than the others, but overall it looks great for the mileage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,656
Location: Plymouth, Minnesota
Car Year: 03
Car Model: Forester
Transmission: 5 MT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I see to many people saying "your numbers are too high/low, you have a problem," while in reality, all the numbers are close to eachother, there is no problem. The actual number varies depending on temperature, pressure, and the gauge you are using.
__________________
2003 Forester 2.5XS Mod Journal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 237
Location: Sydney, AUS
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: Subaru Forester
Transmission: Manual 5 Speed Dual Range
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
(P1 x V1) / T1 = (P2 x V2) / T2
Compression Ratio (volume ratio) = 10:1 on a N/A Subaru (if that is what it is) ignoring the closing position of the inlet valve. P1 is atmospheric or 14.7PSI (absolute). Ignoring heat of compression (i.e. T2 = T1) then P2 at top of compression will be 147PSI absolute or 132.3 PSI Gauge. So with this approximation compresion pressure arround 130 to 135PSI are good! (Testing a hot engine will elevate these theoretical numbers) Cheers! Just noticed you said it was an XT. Redo the math for the turbo CR and it is still okay. Last edited by BillyCorgi; 01-16-2013 at 08:00 PM. Reason: added data |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|