![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance | Advertise |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Now an Outback.
Contributing Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,134
Location: Woking Surrey
Car Year: 00
Car Model: Outback
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Apart from Coopster has anyone gone from an SG to an SF forester?
What are the key differences? Or have you gone from an SF to an SG? if so is the SG much improved over the SF? As most of you know I sold my well modded SF last year and have been contemplating getting another foz, but I would like to know the real world differences between these 2 models..:, it would be doubtful I would buy another SF due the age of them now but if the right one popped up then who knows..
__________________
160bhp 4EAT Outback.....
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 251
Location: Ireland
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester XT
Transmission: Manual 5 speed
Gallery:
11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
id go SG simply because they are newer...
personally i've gone off old cars now, knowing comfort in the SG lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 45
Location: hertfordshire
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester 2.5XT PPP
Transmission: Manual
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Doubt this will be of any help but drove 1 modded SF (originally Forester200's blue one) which i thought handled lovely then gave it a few months, then drove a SG 2.5XT PPP (pre facelift) then drove a SF 2.0T PPP and preferred the extra shove of the 2.5 and abit more modern interior.
So ended up buying the 2.5 (plus i got it for a good rate/under market value as the dude wanted it shifted). |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Don, King of the parts diagram
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,153
Location: Harpenden UK
Car Year: MY11
Car Model: WRX STi Sedan
Transmission: 6MT
Gallery:
3
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Andy,
It's a lot like moving between a Classic and a Newage Impreza, it all depends what you want out of it. I had the MY03 XT and the other half, at that time, had an MY00 S-Turbo. Both similar to drive, have the same capabilities, XT was a bit more refined and newer. If you were looking at an XT to modify again I'd steer clear of the 03XT.
__________________
Was a MY03 FXT 5MT (280bhp/290Lbsft) Now a MY11 WRX STi 4door (342bhp/360Lbsft) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 237
Location: Pearl of the Orient
Car Year: 2007
Car Model: FXT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I have an sg and bought an sf. Both are turbo, sg is more comfortable to drive, maintenance wise sg wins, its more fun to mod the sg. I would say sg wins over any aspect.
__________________
2007 Forester XT 4EAT 1997 Forester T/TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 28
Location: Portsmouth UK
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: Forester 2.5 XT
Transmission: 5MT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Would someone tell me what sg/sf means. It's like talking another language. I have no idea what you're going on about. I drive a 2006 2.5 Xt I assume its a sf ?. ;-)
I just realised the car is an sg as its newer. Reading the post further back.
__________________
Every day's a school day
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Location: scotland
Car Year: 2004
Car Model: forester XTen
Transmission: manual
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Ive gone from a SF to a SG .i loved my SF but couldnt afford to run both fozzys.In a way i wish i still had it as i loved its character ( i dont mean old cars type character) .It just made me smile to drive it.No it isnt as refined,and the interior is better in the SG but id have another in a heartbeat if i didnt have the SG.
If it was between a 2.0xt and a SF id have a SF as its cheaper to buy and less money to loose when modded. Having spent what i have on mine i do worry when it comes to resale time that ill be stuck with it and have to give it away like the last SF SF is older model and SG 2002/2003 on....i think
__________________
330bhp 378lbs and gearbox not loving it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 643
Location: Sussex, UK
Car Year: MY05
Car Model: Forester
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
SG = MY03-MY08 SF = Before that Edit: Missed that you worked it out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 28
Location: Portsmouth UK
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: Forester 2.5 XT
Transmission: 5MT
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Just a thought TMX are you the guy I spoke to a Goodwood when you had a meet Sussex scoobies. It was only a few months ago?.
__________________
Every day's a school day
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 643
Location: Sussex, UK
Car Year: MY05
Car Model: Forester
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
![]() Nope, not a rapper ![]() Wasn't me at Goodwood, haven't been there for a few years now, last time I was there I was going sideways in one of their Sierras on the skidpan ![]() I do know Ginola from Sussex Scoobies though, never been to one of their meets - seems to be mainly Imprezas on there |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,760
Location: location location
Car Year: 05
Car Model: XT2.5
Gallery:
0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I had an SF for 3 years and I've had an SG for 6. Both turbos. I wouldn't go back. I don't think the SG was a revolution exactly but I remember if felt generally nicer when I got it. The SG had more bells and whistles but I remember Sub saying when the SG came out it had more interior space and the body was a lot stiffer. Personally I think they could have done more in that respect.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|