('09-'13) Michelin Primacy MXM4 or MXV4 - Subaru Forester Owners Forum
Subaru Forester Forum
ebay search
Subaru Forester Forum
Go Back   Subaru Forester Owners Forum > Technical Forums and Vehicle Assistance > Tire and Wheel Tech
SubaruForester.org is the premier Subaru Forester Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-29-2012, 07:21 AM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 450
Location: Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester Premium X
Transmission: AT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default Michelin Primacy MXM4 or MXV4

Is there a reason why I see a lot of recommendations for the MXV4 and not the MXM4?

MXM4 seems to get better gas mileage and is a lot cheaper... just wondering.
Inspector is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-29-2012, 07:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Novice Tuner
Contributing Member
Supporting Member
 
MikeDrives1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,568
Location: New Jersey
Car Year: 2001
Car Model: Forester STi
Transmission: 6spd with DCCDpro
Gallery: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
Default

The MXM4 is a little sportier as far as performance goes. When i worked as a tech at a honda dealership, the MXM4 is what we put on cars like the civic Si and S2000 . The MXV4 went on the family cars. They are quieter.



Edit : Yup, i mixed em up lol. Been awhile.
__________________
2001FSTi: 355hp / 350trq.... Heartbreaker mustang dyno #'s
Blouch DOM 1.5XT-r coming soon!........
MikeDrives1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 07:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,065
Location: Northwest Indiana
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: 2006 & 2010 Forester
Transmission: automatic
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default Actually....

You have that backwards...

The MXM4 is the sticker of the two...

MXV4 is slightly quieter and "should" provide a 1MPG gain over the M4...

So, M4 if you want more traction(in the dry)
And V4 if you want longer tread life(at the expense of a little less dry traction)
schan1269 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 07:40 AM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 450
Location: Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester Premium X
Transmission: AT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

MXM4 is V rated, 55,000 mi warranty, and is designated as a low rolling resistance tire.

MXV4 is H rated, 60,000 mi warranty, and is not designated as a low rolling resistance tire.

Just on that I would think the M4 is softer and stickier of the two based on the warranty.

I would think that the M4 would provide better mileage as it's a low rolling resistance tire which doesn't necessarily have to do with grip/softness of the rubber.
Inspector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 07:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,065
Location: Northwest Indiana
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: 2006 & 2010 Forester
Transmission: automatic
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default The MXM4/V4 is...

An oddity...

The fact they BOTH exist is weird. And the "Green X" technology exists in both...

When you find the same size tire where they are both "Green X"(doesn't happen in all sizes) the M still has less tread wear life.

But that is the problem with the 225/55/17(not sure if that is the size you need)...

The M4 IS Green X, the V4 is not.
schan1269 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 08:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 450
Location: Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester Premium X
Transmission: AT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Even worse, there's an MXV4 PLUS which does have the green X LRR, but it seems those are on closeout and are even more expensive than the regular V4's.

and one would think the V4's would be V rated, but they're not...only the M4's are.
Inspector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 08:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,065
Location: Northwest Indiana
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: 2006 & 2010 Forester
Transmission: automatic
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default Another tire...

Provided you can find it, that I would rank as the best of both the M4 and V4 is the Fulda EcoControl.

But...finding a place that sells them...not easy. Fulda makes great tires.
schan1269 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 08:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
crewzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,050
Location: Mills River, NC, USA
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: Forester X Prem AWP
Transmission: 5MT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Lightbulb

Quote:
MXV4 is H rated, 60,000 mi warranty, and is not designated as a low rolling resistance tire.
Several of the Michelin MXV4 tires are designated as Green X / LRR (select "Sizes" tab). It earned top marks for LRR in Consumer Reports' test of size 215/60R16. It also scored very well overall in Tire Rack's test of "Grand Touring All-Season" tires.

We were very impressed with the MXV4's performance on our 2006 Accord.

HTH,
Jim / crewzer
__________________
12 Forester 2.5X FB25 5MT Premium AWP PZEV
09 Forester 2.5X EJ25 5MT Premium AWP PZEV (sold 7/2011)

Last edited by crewzer; 03-29-2012 at 09:04 AM.
crewzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 09:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,065
Location: Northwest Indiana
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: 2006 & 2010 Forester
Transmission: automatic
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default To add to what Crewzer said...

The "toaster on wheels" (as some people call the Forester), unless you upgrade the suspension bits...

I don't think the M4 is a worthy trade off from the V4. The "suspension giving up" is the main determinant of when tires give up.

If the M4 creates even .01 more G in cornering...I'd be shocked.

If you had a turbo and you drove aggressive and/or lowered your car, then you might have a case for the M4.
schan1269 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 11:35 AM   #10 (permalink)
Forum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 450
Location: Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester Premium X
Transmission: AT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Or if I wanted to save $100 for no real difference in performance?
Inspector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 12:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
TC2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,118
Location: Delmont, Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2009
Car Model: Forester X Premium
Gallery: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

You wont be disappointed with these tires.
__________________
2009 Forester X Premium 4EAT

Respect The Wagon!
TC2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Forum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 450
Location: Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester Premium X
Transmission: AT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

For what its worth for anyone searching, I ended up getting a massive blowout on my old set of tires and got the MXV4's because I was in a pinch and none of the local shops could get the MXM4's. I have to say I'm fairly disappointed in the MXV4's.....think I should have listened to MikeDrives instead of Schan. I think they're just too soft of a tire. The grip is fine, but they feel too floaty and disconnected from the road for me. I feel like I'm bouncing around on the road and constantly have to correct them on the interstate. Body roll is really noticeable. .... and that is with the set aired up several PSI high.
Inspector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
crewzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,050
Location: Mills River, NC, USA
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: Forester X Prem AWP
Transmission: 5MT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Unhappy

I'm sorry to learn that you don't like the MXV4's. I "need" (want) new tires for our BMW, and MXV4's were on my short list until I found I can't get them in the correct combination of size and service description (225/50R17 94W).

It looks like we may end up with the Primacy MXM4 is that size, although the "W" speed rating spec (168 mph) is asinine.

Best of luck!
Jim / crewzer
__________________
12 Forester 2.5X FB25 5MT Premium AWP PZEV
09 Forester 2.5X EJ25 5MT Premium AWP PZEV (sold 7/2011)
crewzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 05:03 AM   #14 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 115
Location: Seattle, WA
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: X Premium
Transmission: Automatic
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Good info. I bought MXV4's for my '08 Civic. I thought they were fantastic tires. My brother had a set on a '05 Accord, and thought the same. I figured some of what I don't like about my '12 Forester could be fixed with a set of them. It did bug me that they are for Camry, Accord,etc. And also that the Geolanders on my Forester are very highly rated tires, made me wonder if I might be looking in the wrong direction.
I don't see a ton of tires that show up for my '12 Forester when I search tire sites online. If you go with "all tires in this size" you get a big list, but you are looking at Camry tires again....
bearcrkrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 05:22 AM   #15 (permalink)
Forum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 450
Location: Pennsylvania
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester Premium X
Transmission: AT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Yea, as with any tire it really depends on your personal preferences and what you're used to, so blanket "these tires are awesome or these tires suck" comments are tough to judge. My wife would think that if the tire is black and round its great. :) Obviously, I need a more connected tire, probably a sportier tire like a high performance allseason. If i were to do it again, I would probably search out the MXM's.
Inspector is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Subaru Forester Owners Forum > Technical Forums and Vehicle Assistance > Tire and Wheel Tech

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:10 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.