Turbo reliability? - Subaru Forester Owners Forum
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-19-2012, 04:15 PM Thread Starter
Forum Member
 
plnelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 118
Car Year: 2014
Car Model: Forester Premium
Transmission: CVT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Turbo reliability?

I'm looking to replace my 2003 Forester 2.5 XS. It's had a lot of reliability problems but that could just this one car or model year, since in general Subaru's are supposed to pretty reliable. When it runs I've liked it - good handling and visibility, good for skiing and hiking trips, and trips to Home Depot or the beach, great for winter driving, lots of cargo room for a car that's also small enough to parallel park in tight city streets.

But one complaint I've had since I bought it has been tepid acceleration. I feel like dropping it into 3rd whenever I accelerate onto the highway or to pass. And I know it's not just my Forester because whenever I take my car in for service the dealer's loaner Foresters are just as bad and I've seen lots of complaints on the web, too.

One solution would be to get an Outback or Rav4 with 6 cylinders. But another would be a Forester Turbo. But I've seen scary comments about the Turbo - early self-destruction; expensive repairs, and the need to baby it - people on this forum have suggested oil changes every 3K miles, for example, which seems crazy to me.

Comments?

Thanks in advance.
plnelson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-19-2012, 05:17 PM
Super Moderator
 
Loscaldazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Plymouth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,081
Car Year: 03
Car Model: Forester
Transmission: 5 MT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Most would say the Turbo's are more reliable than the non turbo's, as long as they have been maintained. Quality synthetic oil and a regular oil change interval, and there really isn't much that breaks....The turbo can go bad on some (almost always 100,000+ miles), and is relatively simple to replace your self if it does go bad. With Quality syntehtic oil, oil filter, and using only 91+ octane (93 is the best if you can find it), can't see any problems.
Loscaldazar is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-19-2012, 06:29 PM
The Seventh Sister
Administrator
 
pleiad7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 27,312
Car Year: 2004
Car Model: Forester XT Premium
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery: 70
Garage
Feedback Score: 50 reviews
^^What he said. No need to baby it either.

-Silke
04 FXT PP PSM ~ "Subed"
98 Forester S ~ "Slynki"
pleiad7 is offline  
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-20-2012, 04:32 AM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 169
Car Year: 2011
Car Model: Forester XT Touring
Transmission: Auto
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Depending on year, you should be aware of this problem.

http://www.subaruforester.org/vbulle...3-p2441-63347/
mooo is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-20-2012, 09:57 AM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 296
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: Forester
Transmission: Autotragic
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by plnelson View Post
- people on this forum have suggested oil changes every 3K miles, for example, which seems crazy to me.
Oil changes every 3K miles is crazy?
kfergiez is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-20-2012, 10:07 AM
The Seventh Sister
Administrator
 
pleiad7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 27,312
Car Year: 2004
Car Model: Forester XT Premium
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery: 70
Garage
Feedback Score: 50 reviews
I change my oil every 5k miles. 170k+ on the clock, no issues...

-Silke
04 FXT PP PSM ~ "Subed"
98 Forester S ~ "Slynki"
pleiad7 is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-20-2012, 12:21 PM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N.ID
Posts: 823
Car Year: 2004
Car Model: Forester XT
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 7 reviews
I read HERE and HERE that Subaru recommends interval @ 3750 miles on oil changes on the turbo cars for 'normal' driving and 7500 for 'light' driving.


<and now for the sales pitch>
For replacements, go drive the '06-'12 RAV4 V6 - my wife's ride ('07) - and I think you'll be in for a treat. 0-60 in under 7 seconds, 28+ MPG Hwy (<70MPH), and more interior room than the my '04 XT. Highly rated by CR, too. Ours has been uber-reliable and other than 2 issues - one is the 'infamous' throttle/carpet/'driver' recall; the other a noise in the steering column that was a TSB- it's only been in for regular maintenance.

I love my boosted XT, but the RAV4 is a nice compromise when I get to drive it on road trips, and has been cheap to keep (timing chain - no Tbelt either).

Td

'98 S-Sold
'04 FXT-SOLD
'93 SS-SOLD
'02 GG

Last edited by wtdash; 07-24-2012 at 07:42 AM.
wtdash is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-21-2012, 09:52 PM
Forum Member
 
jjensendroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 99
Car Year: 2013
Car Model: XT Touring
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I haven't had any problems w/ my Turbo, but I did experience the 2 codes mentioned Secodary Air Valves P2443 and P2441 and I had it fixed and have had no other problems. I even ordered a new 2013 XT Touring and should be getting it late next month.
jjensendroid is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-21-2012, 10:02 PM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 457
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: Forester
Transmission: 4 speed auto
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
You have to be mindful of turbos

I like both but if I had to choose I would choose the 6 cylinder. Sure the turbo has great acceleration but only above a certain rpm. The six has smoother acceleration from idle to cruise. A six is as simple as an engine can be. I know turbos are technology that has been around for 100 years and recently has been perfected but one has to been mindful of a turbo, not suddenly turning it off, idling it for at least one minute before starting off, and changing the oil religiously. They are both good. It depends on your mindset.
Easy Fixer is offline  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-22-2012, 01:43 AM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 80 Miles west of Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 455
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester L.L. Bean
Transmission: 4EAT Auto
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Turbos can go for a while. My last car was a VW Passat TDI and had 241k miles when I sold it, on the original working turbo. Now, that is not Subaru, but I would assume that with proper maintenance Subaru turbos should go just as long, within reason.
sequoia14 is offline  
post #11 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-22-2012, 05:22 AM
Forum Member
Contributing Member
 
Superacerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Juneau, AK
Posts: 3,251
Car Year: 2009
Car Model: 2.5xt w/ td05-20g
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I guess I'm polar opposite from some of you guys. Lol. I won't buy a non turbo car cause I love modding and the turbos are far easier to play with than naturally aspirated. I'm on car number three and haven't had an issue with any of them concerning turbos. They were all custom tuned for extra power too! I don't push them beyond known limits and everything works great.

There are obviously times when they may break for whatever reason just like any other part, and the posts you read are from the few hundredths of a percent that have had issues.

Either vehicle you chose will be reliable in my opinion, so get what best suits your needs and satisfies your personality.

TD05-20g @ 24psi with Stage II AWDTUNING Block
Superacerc's Journal
Superacerc is online now  
post #12 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-22-2012, 09:20 AM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 62
Car Year: 2001
Car Model: Forester L
Transmission: Automatic
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I had an old '86 LebaronGTS with over 200k kms and it still had the original working turbo on it... Dodge turbos were as cheap and crappy as you could get them lol. If you take care of it, it should last you a long long time. Any vehicle can run into unusual problems, a lot of the 'common' problems on these forums are actually less common problems overall just people searching for an answer tend to find the same spot to ask the question. I tend to shy away from turbos because I tend to be lazy and neglect my maintenance at times, something which turbos are less forgiving of.
nasoj007 is offline  
post #13 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-23-2012, 08:50 PM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 80 Miles west of Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 455
Car Year: 2005
Car Model: Forester L.L. Bean
Transmission: 4EAT Auto
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Just do the maintenance correctly and on time and you will be fine, and rewarded with greater performance. This caveat is also true for most modern N/A cars, which also require timely maintenance.
sequoia14 is offline  
post #14 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 03:57 PM Thread Starter
Forum Member
 
plnelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 118
Car Year: 2014
Car Model: Forester Premium
Transmission: CVT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loscaldazar View Post
Most would say the Turbo's are more reliable than the non turbo's, as long as they have been maintained. Quality synthetic oil and a regular oil change interval, and there really isn't much that breaks....The turbo can go bad on some (almost always 100,000+ miles), and is relatively simple to replace your self if it does go bad. With Quality syntehtic oil, oil filter, and using only 91+ octane (93 is the best if you can find it), can't see any problems.

How could they be MORE reliable? They've got all the same things to go wrong as the non-turbo car, plus the extra turbo components to go wrong. Not only that but turbocharging subjects the engine to higher temperatures and pressures, so how will that improve reliability?
plnelson is offline  
post #15 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 04:06 PM Thread Starter
Forum Member
 
plnelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 118
Car Year: 2014
Car Model: Forester Premium
Transmission: CVT
Gallery: 0
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by kfergiez View Post
Oil changes every 3K miles is crazy?
Considering that the recommended interval for the non-turbocharged Forester (at least my 2003) is 7500 miles, then yes, I'd say that 3K mile intervals means that turbo's need to be babied compared to normal cars.

What does the Subari owner's manual say for 2012 or 2013 Forester turbos for normal driving? (I "get" that oil needs to be replaced more frequently for hard driving - but hardly any of my driving would be considered "hard").
plnelson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Subaru Forester Owners Forum > General Forums > Forester Shopping

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Subaru Forester Owners Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome