Forester 2012 2.5 vs Outback 2012 2.5 - Subaru Forester Owners Forum
Subaru Forester Forum
ebay search
Subaru Forester Forum
Go Back   Subaru Forester Owners Forum > General Forums > Forester Shopping
SubaruForester.org is the premier Subaru Forester Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-27-2011, 10:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 15
Location: Michigan
Car Year: 09
Car Model: Forester
Transmission: 2.5
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default Forester 2012 2.5 vs Outback 2012 2.5

Having a truly difficult time deciding which one to buy! Kind of like the looks of the Forester better but fuel economy and engine is more advanced in Outback. I mostly drive on expressway approximately 85% of the time and would like to go off-roading but rarely. Help!
kleyneri is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-27-2011, 10:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13
Location: Portland, Oregon
Car Year: 2009
Car Model: Forester XT
Transmission: 4EAT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Default

I beleive the '12 forester has the new FB engine in it as well. What are you saying the outback has that gives it better milage?
Flyingjibus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 10:30 AM   #3 (permalink)
adc
Forum Member
Contributing Member
Supporting Member
 
adc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,009
Location: Elizabethtown, Pa.
Car Year: 2008
Car Model: 2.5X
Gallery: 98
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

You just need to compare them yourself. Engines are the same. Outback has CVT Forester is 4 speed Auto.
__________________
Be careful what you wish for.
adc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 10:38 AM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 529
Location: Antioch, Ca
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: Outback Limited
Transmission: cvt
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

'12 OB has the older EJ engine. The CVT is the key to better fuel economy in the OB.
upflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 11:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Lone Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,727
Location: Midwest USA
Car Year: 2009
Car Model: EJ25 2.5X
Transmission: Manual
Gallery: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

To understand the differences between the two, you need to consider the platform each is built around. The Forester is built around the Impreza platform. The Outback is built around the Legacy platform. The Outback will be heavier and won't have the lighter touch feel like the Forester as far as handling goes. Personally, I'd stay away from the CVT. The 4EAT transmission in the Forester is pretty proven and robust.
__________________
2009 2.5X, Dark Gray
2013 Ducati Multistrada
Lone Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 12:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Ol' Timer
Contributing Member
Supporting Member
 
abacall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,060
Location: Utah
Car Year: 2006
Car Model: WRX
Transmission: Spec-C 6MT
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 26 reviews
Default

I like the planted feel of the Outbacks. And if you drive lots of highway, the better fuel economy might be a selling point.
Drive both, see which you prefer.
__________________
Whatever you do, do it right.

abacall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 02:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 891
Location: Chicago
Car Year: 2003
Car Model: Outback
Gallery: 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

OB with CVT will win the MPG battle. Drive both and see what feels better for you. Both can handle light off road duties in their stock forms. Many 4th Gen OB owners add a stiffer rear antisway bar to improve the handling off the bat.

I haven't driven the current generation of either the OB or the Foz to remark on that.
__________________
2003 Outback 2.5 AWP.
AWDFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 01:03 AM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 15
Location: Michigan
Car Year: 09
Car Model: Forester
Transmission: 2.5
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I noticed the Outback form has a ton of threads bashing Forester and claiming Outback has a much smoother ride and more upscale. Are Outback people just more passionate than Forester's?
kleyneri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 04:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
funkymonkey1002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,011
Location: Boston
Car Year: 2004
Car Model: 2.5 XT
Transmission: 4eat
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Default

The outback definitely has a bit of an edge in regards to being upscale, as that's where it fits in within subaru's lineup. The interior etc feels a bit more high end and quieter.

For highway use I'd probably go with the outback. The CVT or 6mt will give better highway mileage, and it has a bit smoother and more planted feel on highway use.

Forester wins out for around town, offroad etc.

Not sure if they've fixed the issue, but outbacks have had problems in the past with a steering "shake" issue.

I'd try to get as thorough a test drive as possible with both, it's really up to personal preference. I personally like the 05-09 outback and 03-08 forester much more than the newer ones. I like the 09+ foresters, but they do feel a bit cheaper than the older models imo.
__________________
04xt/4eat, 16g, STI bits and bobs
funkymonkey1002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 06:08 AM   #10 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
daveg3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 122
Location: Buffalo, NY
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: Forester
Gallery: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I have the older engine but M5, get 27-28 expressway 70-75, I have not driven the OB, Foz is competent, have done several 800 mi trips.
__________________
Dave G
2010 Forester X M5 Camellia Red
daveg3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 07:23 AM   #11 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 170
Location: Seattle, WA
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: Forester X
Transmission: 5MT
Gallery: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I actually let looks decide. :-) I like the look of the Forester better.

I do think the current generation OB looks pretty cool too, but I still prefer the look of the Foz.

As for OB owners bashing Foresters - in my experience if you pay more $ than someone else for a car, you spend a lot of time convincing yourself you made the right choice. Both the Forester and OB are top rated in their respective categories.
Draco_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 03:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 891
Location: Chicago
Car Year: 2003
Car Model: Outback
Gallery: 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

As someone who owns an OB and has driven a Forester, I find them hard to compare.

People who like their vehicle feeling like a car like the OB and not the Foz.
People who like their vehicle feeling more like a SUV like the Foz and not OB.

In my opinion, the Legacy/Outback platform seems to be the mainstream "flagship" for SoA, so it seems mildly more upscale in quality...but honestly, I just preferred the way it handled and the cargo are layout. I would, and probably will, own both without complaint (other than styling).

My wife wanted a wagon and not a small SUV, which she considers the Foz due to the driver's height and sight lines.
__________________
2003 Outback 2.5 AWP.
AWDFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 05:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 102
Location: B.C. Interior
Car Year: 2012
Car Model: 2012 Legacy 3.6R
Transmission: 5 sp. auto
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funkymonkey1002 View Post
The outback definitely has a bit of an edge in regards to being upscale, as that's where it fits in within subaru's lineup. The interior etc feels a bit more high end and quieter.

For highway use I'd probably go with the outback. The CVT or 6mt will give better highway mileage, and it has a bit smoother and more planted feel on highway use.

Forester wins out for around town, offroad etc.

Not sure if they've fixed the issue, but outbacks have had problems in the past with a steering "shake" issue.

I'd try to get as thorough a test drive as possible with both, it's really up to personal preference. I personally like the 05-09 outback and 03-08 forester much more than the newer ones. I like the 09+ foresters, but they do feel a bit cheaper than the older models imo.

My thoughts exactly in regards to the steering wheel shake / schimmy on the Outback as well as Legacy. Can anyone confirm if this has been fixed on the 2010/2011 models OB and Legacy ?
108XT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 08:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 891
Location: Chicago
Car Year: 2003
Car Model: Outback
Gallery: 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Mid 2011 and newer OB's seem to have little to no issues reported. Prior builds is a crap shoot...some shake immediately, others 5k, 30k, others with no shake at 30k+ miles.

Newer is better for the 4th Gen Legacy/Outback platform.
__________________
2003 Outback 2.5 AWP.
AWDFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 01:33 AM   #15 (permalink)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Location: Chicago area
Car Year: 2010
Car Model: FXT limited
Transmission: 4 auto
Gallery: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default Forester va outback

I like the Forester (2010 turbo)

What are the prices? the FXT (forester turbo) i think was a little cheaper than the outback, last i looked.

85% highway: outback is a better road car in handling/feeling

some off road: FXT better, hands down. great handling at 80 on a gravel road (as would be the outback)

better high speed mileage in the outback.

super visibility in the FXT. Wonderful head clearance/space
jsandow is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Subaru Forester Owners Forum > General Forums > Forester Shopping

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:00 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.